Did The Supreme Court Get It Right Ruling In Favor of Presidential Immunity?
Host: Gerard Ramalho
Guests: Paul Padda, Paul Padda Law & David Orentlicher, Dir., UNLV Boyd School of Law
In a historic decision, the Supreme Court ruled that former presidents have at least some immunity from criminal prosecution for “official acts” in office, no matter their “politics, policy, or party,” but stipulated that that protection doesn’t cover everything. Should presidents be immune?
Subscribe now!
Things We Talk About in This Episode
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud
Exercitation ullamco laboris
ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure
Eolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt
mollit anim id est laborum. Ut enim ad minim
Episode Credits
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud
Exercitation ullamco laboris
ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure
Eolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt
mollit anim id est laborum. Ut enim ad minim
Like what you heard or read? Sign up below for alerts about new episodes.
Paul Padda Law makes donation to support victims of sri Lanka Bombings
Follow The Vegas Lawyers
Recent Episodes
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud
- Exercitation ullamco laboris ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure
- Eolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt
- Mollit anim id est laborum. Ut enim ad minim